Monday 13 November 2017

Fw: When a Gujarat chief minister was shot dead by Pakistani fighter pilot

----- Forwarded Message -----



When a Gujarat chief minister was shot dead by Pakistani fighter pilot

Balwantrai Mehta died along with seven others who were travelling in the Beechcraft chopper during the Indo-Pakistan war in 1965.

Kumar Shakti Shekhar
Kumar Shakti Shekhar | Posted by Bijin Jose
New Delhi, November 10, 2017 | UPDATED 18:10 IST
Pakistani Fighter Jet (Image for representation | Photo: Reuters)

Even before the upcoming Gujarat Assembly election had heated up, the Congress conducted a poll on Twitter under its #KnowYourLegacy series.

It asked the name of former chief minister of Gujarat who is considered as the 'Architect of Panchayati Raj' in India. Among the four options were the names of Anandiben Patel, Keshubhai Patel, Balwantrai Mehta and Narendra Modi.

Majority of the respondents voted for Balwantrai Mehta. They were correct. Mehta was the second chief minister of Gujarat and he is considered a pioneer in panchayati raj institutions in the country.

Twitter Ads info and privacyHowever, one would wonder how many of the respondents even knew that Mehta was also the only sitting chief minister who was killed by an enemy country.

He died when the chopper he was flying in on September 19, 1965 was shot by a Pakistan Air Force pilot near the Indo-Pak border in the Rann of Kutch.

Mehta died along with seven others who were travelling in the Beechcraft chopper. They included his wife Sarojben, three members of his staff, one journalist and two crew members.

The ghastly incident took place at the height of the Indo-Pakistan war. Forty-six years after the incident the pilot of the Pakistani fighter aircraft wrote a letter to the daughter of the chief pilot of the Beechcraft and apologised to her. The daughter too replied to her father's killer and forgave him.

THE INCIDENT

On the fateful day, Mehta flew to the Kutch border after stopping at Mithapur, 400 km away from Ahmedabad. Minutes after taking off from Mithapur, his aircraft was intercepted by a Pakistani fighter pilot Qais Hussain.

According to reports, Hussain, then just 25 years of age, entered into the Indian airspace at 20,000 ft. It descended to 3,000 ft at which the Indian chopper was flying.

While waiting for permission from Pakistani ground-control interception, Hussain first hovered around Beechcraft.

Perhaps on spotting the Pakistani aircraft, Beechcraft started waggling its wings, in an indication to have mercy and spare it. The Indian chopper was flown by chief pilot of the Gujarat government Jehangir M Engineer, who was a former Indian Air Force pilot, and his co-pilot.

However, Hussain fired two salvos in the air on getting nod from his superiors. Both the salvos hit the chopper near Suthali village, about 100 km from Mithapur.The Beechcraft exploded in the air and turned into a ball of fire before falling on the ground. The All India Radio announced the tragic incident in its 7 pm news bulletin.

HUSSAIN'S APOLOGY

In the first week of August 2011, Hussain sent an email to Engineer's daughter Farida Singh. Explaining the account of the fateful day, he apologised to her.

He wrote:"Dear Mrs Singh,

"I am glad that by now we know about each other and it is no surprise that I am writing to you, thanks to Naushad Patel and Jagan Pillarisetti."The incident happened 46 years back but it is as fresh in my mind as if it had happened yesterday. The aircraft flown by your father had drifted off course by many a miles and in his search for the destination, he had been going up and down in the border area of Rann of Katchh for quite some time and it made our Radar Controllers uncomfortable.  I happened to be strapped up in my aircraft along with another pilot (my Leader) in his, on two minutes take-off alert. We were scrambled but I had to take off alone, and with the help from my radar controller, intercepted your father's aircraft which was considered to be on a recce mission to open a new war front. I caught sight of him at 3000' and made a pass so close that I could read his markings and the number of the aircraft. Your father spotted my presence immediately and he started climbing and waggling his wings seeking mercy.

"Instead of firing at him at first sight, I relayed to my controller that I had intercepted an eight seat transport aircraft (guessing by the four side windows) and wanted further instructions to deal with it. At the same time, I was hoping that I would be called back without firing a shot. There was a lapse of 3 to 4 long minutes before I was given clear orders to shoot the aircraft.

"After the shooting, I had a sense of achievement and satisfaction that I had completed my mission and destroyed any recce data that might have been collected to open a new war front. I landed back at Mauripur, Karachi with my fuel tanks bone dry and was greeted by my seniors and other squadron colleagues. Later that evening, All India Radio announced the names of the occupants who had lost their lives in that aircraft.

"The reason that I have been trying to get in touch with you since recently is an article by Air Cdre Kaiser Tufail in April 2011, in which he researched the whole incident and came out with his story by interviewing me, the radar controller (a Flying Officer) and his supervisor (a Wing Commander) who took the decision to order the shoot. I have also read numerous versions that appeared in the Indian media at the time, said to be eyewitness accounts from peasants of Mithapur which are unfortunately based on hearsay. Even the findings of an Enquiry Committee constituted by the Indian Government are nowhere near to what actually happened. I was alone at the site of incident while my Leader who took off finally about 6 to 7 minutes after me (due to change of aircraft and a new pilot), was perched at the border at 20,000' acting as a relay station between me and  the controller at Badin. I had lost contact somewhere while descending to 3,000' and had we not had this aircraft at 20,000' at the border, I would not have found your father's aircraft and he would not have lost his life along with all the others. Nonetheless, the unfortunate part in all this is that I had to execute the orders of my controller.

"Mrs Singh, I have chosen to go into this detail to tell you that it all happened in the line of duty and it was not governed by the concept that 'everything is fair in love and war', the way it has been portrayed by the Indian media due to lack of information. I did not play foul and went by the rules of business but the unfortunate loss of precious lives, no matter how it happens, hurts each human and I am no exception. I feel sorry for you, your family and the other seven families who lost their dearest ones. I feel greatly grieved that you lost your brother Noshir recently. If an opportunity ever arises that I could meet you face to face to condole the death of your father 46 years back I would grab it with both hands. I would highly appreciate if you please convey my feelings to the other members of your family, who were equally hurt by the untimely departure of Jungoo to the next world."I hope and pray that you and your family stay well

"My best regards"

"Qais"

FARIDA'S FORGIVENESS

More than six years ago, Engineer's daughter Farida wrote an emotional reply to Hussain. Instead of holding him responsible for the death of her father, the then chief minister, his wife and others, she blamed it on circumstances.

"From: Farida Singh10 August 2011 09:49Subject: Re: CondolenceTo: Qais Hussain"

"Dear Mr. Hussain,

"Firstly, thank you for your condolences on the passing away of my brother Noshir.

"I am somewhat overwhelmed at receiving this letter, even though I was expecting it as Jagan Pillarisetti had been in touch with me recently on this.

"It took courage for you to write this. And for me, too, (I say this humbly) it takes the same to write back . But my father was Courage and Grace at their finest and I now speak on behalf of him, my extraordinary, gracious mother (who survived my father by just 16 years), my late brother Noshir and my elder sister in Canada who is unfortunately legally blind.

"Yes, this was the one incident which defined our lives henceforth. But in all the struggles that followed, we never, not for one moment, bore bitterness or hatred for the person who actually pulled the trigger and caused my father's death. The fact that this all happened in the confusion of a tragic war was never lost to us. We are all pawns in this terrible game of War and Peace.

"A little more about my father. An ace pilot if ever there as one. A WWII veteran fighter pilot, a great leader of men, a willing team player, strong in body and spirit. This would have been just the view of an adoring daughter, had it not been reflected by all those fortunate enough to know him. Most of all was the generosity of spirit, and his intuitive understanding of the pain of others. Hence it is now easy for me to reach out my hand to receive your message. This incident is indeed a prime example of what damage strife and mindless battles can drive even good men to do.

"Thank you again for your gesture. I know it was not an easy thing for you to do.

"In closing, I would like to say that I have no idea as to how your email has made the front page in some prominent dailies here. (Jagan knows how publicity-shy I generally am). A friend told me about it and I then re-checked my inbox and opened your mail this morning, 4 days after you sent it.

"However, I am glad that it is now public as it can do nothing but heal wounds, not just on a personal scale but in a much wider arena. And most of all, my father would have liked that it goes towards bringing a spark of forgiveness between our two peoples, who after all were one.

Warm regards,Farida"





Saturday 21 October 2017

Fw: From: Gurvinder Singh / The Ghosts of 1962

----- Forwarded Message -----


Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 4:42
To: ...
Subject: The Ghosts of 1962

Like   Tweet   Pin   +1   in  
Guru Wonder Mastehead 01J -Plain
 

The Ghosts of 1962

***

Lest we forget the war and the price we paid.

Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.

India China areas of conflict in 1962-01

In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake.
Modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy.

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun.

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wanted to pull China into their respective orbits of influence.

The preference for China was because world powers never expected India to survive very long as an independent nation and thus India was considered dispensable. For their great game of global dominance, America decided that an unbridgeable divide had to be created between the two traditionally friendly Asian giants, in which China would be supported and India would be sacrificed.

____________

The view of the American establishment can be summed up by words of former American president Nixon 'US had no sympathy for the kind of neutralism which draws no moral distinction between the Communist world and the free world.'

So desperate was Nehru to win over China, the idealistic and impractical Nehru kept on conceding to every demand that China put forward without getting any reciprocity from China. In the bargain Nehru sacrificed India's vital political, military and strategic interests. He bent to such an extent that he fell over backward taking India down. Nehru failed to realise that leaders and nations must seek respect more than liking. In the real world, both soft and hard power is essential.

After China occupied Tibet in 1952, Nehru hurriedly recognised Tibet as belonging to China.
In 1954 the Chinese submitted a list of 9 demands to India, which were unfavourable to India, but Nehru quickly accepted.
Nehru consistently refused military help to the Tibetan people, so as to appease the Chinese leadership.

There were two main areas of tension between India and China. India's supposed support for Tibet, and the dispute over ownership of territory on the Indo -Sino border. The CIA saw these two areas as the fault lines to generate conflict between India and China.

The Americans resorted to using their greatest assets, the people they had cultivated.
Declassified KGB and CIA documents reveal that many leaders, bureaucrats of the era were corrupt and bought out at ridiculously low sums, Oleg Kalugin the Russian master spy remarked, "It seems the whole of India was up for sale." Both the Soviets and America had a field day in fermenting trouble in India.

vk krishna menon nehru 20070319

Krishna Menon and Nehru

B.N. Mullik jp 2402582g

B.N. Mullik (Head of intelligence)

Bombastic BM Kaul

Lt. Gen. Brij Mohan Kaul

Defence minister Krishna Menon was in the Soviet communist camp and Finance minister Morarji Desai and YB Chawan in the American capitalists camp. General Thimayya and several generals and bureaucrats were much tilted in favour of the Americans.

Nehru's team was built around his friendship with certain individuals rather than on merit. Individual egos orbiting a vain and egoistic Nehru inhibited the formulation and implementation of a common philosophy and strategy, within his team. Everyone in his team hated and opposed everyone else. It seems that everyone in Nehru's team did pretty much what they wanted.

The military leadership too was thoroughly compromised, such as the appointment of

Gen. Pran Nath Thapar, (Karan Thapar's father) as the army chief simply on paper. He exercised no real power or influence.

It was Lt. Gen. Brij Mohan Kaul., a by-product of flamboyance and nepotism, who due to his proximity of being a relative of Nehru, and repeatedly promoted out of turn, who called the shots. As Corps Commander, Kaul not only vacated his post during the war, but also reported sick and parked himself at his residence in Delhi, from where he incompetently directed the war.

Gen. Kaul, "met the US under Secretary of State Chester Bowles the summer of 1962 without the knowledge of the Prime Minister and Defence Minister and discussed with him the possibility of a Chinese attack that fall. The question is, why did Kaul, a serving army officer meet Bowles? If Kaul knew about the imminence of the attack, then why did he proceed on holiday?

Another villain in the piece was BN Mullik (Head of Intelligence). He incompetently or deliberately fed Nehru false information and met with CIA staff and carried out their bidding.

Nehru based on the advice of these men, adopted the 'Forward Policy', which was the provocative building of many Indians army outposts further north of the McMahon Line in disputed territory claimed by China and even behind Chinese border posts with a view to preventing supplies to the Chinese and forcing their withdrawal from disputed territory. Mullik repeatedly assured Nehru, Menon and others that China would not react, and Kaul assured Nehru that he would throw them out even if they reacted. This action was in retaliation to China's unilateral action of building a road across Aksai Chin.

The Chinese claimed that 120,000 sq. kms of land in India's control actually belonged to China. What China really wanted most was access between their two main western provinces - Xinjiang and Tibet. China proposed a settlement, it was willing to take an uninhabited but strategically important Aksai Chin from India and give up its claim on NEFA (Arunachal Pradesh). Nehru refused to even discuss the matter. This became a major point of contention.

Mullik thought it best to show an aggressive stand. When permission was denied to deploy , troops along the non militarised and quiet border, as it might be unnecessarily provocative, Mullik exceed his brief. He borrowed from the Inspector General of police of Jammu & Kashmir, and posted in the Ladakh area, a company of armed CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force). This gave rise to Chinese fears of India's aggressive intentions and duplicity.

It is difficult to imagine that Nehru was unaware of what was happening. The CIA with help from Mullik, helped supply arms, gave training, and support to the 40,000 strong Tibetan National Volunteer Defence Army (NVDA), led by the Dalai Lama's brothers Gyalo Thondup and Thubten Jigme Norbu. The CIA gave the Tibetan fighters outdated weapons, insufficient supplies and ammunition, no radio or communications equipment, trained them in jungle guerrilla warfare which was unsuitable for Tibetan terrain etc.

In view of Nehru's disinterest in saving Tibet, The American objective shifted from not saving Tibet to triggering the destruction of the Tibetan freedom movement and anger China at India's expense. Chinese reports mention that 87,000 Tibetans being eliminated during the March 1959 Lhasa uprising. As a consequence, His Holiness the Dalai Lama fled to and sought refuge in India.

All these actions convinced a livid China that India was playing a double game. China decided that negotiations with India were leading nowhere. India had to be taught a lesson once and for all. They thought rather than partner with, it was better to subordinate India to China.

China Tibet Taiwan reference map - 3e3

China was however worried about the support of America to Formosa (Taiwan) for an impending attack on China. This would mean fighting a war simultaneously on a second front, something China could not afford.

However in June 1962 the Americans gave China a categorical assurance that there would be no attack from Taiwan and that America would remain neutral in the case of a Indo -Sino conflict. Thus China was able to redeploy all its best troops, artillery and equipment from its Eastern front to Tibet for the invasion of India.

The Soviet support to India remained a serious concern. Then in early October 1962 the Soviets assured China that it would drop its India tilt in case of a Chinese attack on India.

The die was cast, the trap was set.
Indian intelligence reported that Chinese preparations of war were afoot. China mobilised equipment and 80,000 troops over the year for the offensive. In the meantime Nehru and Menon supremely confident of their diplomacy and the support of the superpowers retained just 10,000 poorly clothed, almost unarmed brave soldiers without any ammunition, with inadequate equipment, transport, or communications.

From August 1962 onwards skirmishes at the border were now increasing both in frequency and intensity. While the clouds of war loomed on the horizon, Nehru was busy travelling to Paris, Lagos and Accra and Colombo, returning only on 16 October 1962. Krishna Menon left for New York on 17 September 1962 to attend the UN General Assembly and returned to India only on 30 September 1962. Kaul went on holiday to Kashmir.

To India's shock and dismay on 20th October 1962 China invaded India occupied an area of 90,000 square kms including numerous key towns, and strategic locations, before announcing a unilateral ceasefire on 20th November.

India suffered a humiliating defeat, and we lost 3,250 soldiers, nearly 2,000 of them died due to improper clothing, many bodies of brave Indian soldiers frozen to death, were recovered with guns in hand but empty bullet pouches.

The shocking Indian performance was a disaster waiting to happen, the result of a politically and militarily, stupid, incompetent and corrupt leadership. So dysfunctional was the leadership that the relatively powerful Indian Air Force was not even asked to intervene, which would have turned the tide in India's favour.

Scrap the army - The-political-view-in-India

Ignoring proof that both Pakistan and China were heavily arming themselves. Nehru, proclaimed that since India was a peace loving nation, an army was superfluous. So Nehru and his band of merry men went about rapidly reducing the strength and capabilities of the already depleted armed forces by a further 25%, reducing capital expenditure on equipment, infrastructure etc. not purchasing ammunition, and phasing out much of local defence production of arms and ammunition and all defence items.

Nehru was assisted in his absurd geo political and military leadership by his brilliant but egoistic friend, Krishna Menon the defence minister. Menon could drive and intimidate people but never inspire nor lead.

One of the driving forces was not 'non violence' but paranoia. Nehru was paranoid that the Indian army might one day stage a coup and therefore preferred a weak military leadership and retained an iron grip control of the army without building competencies nor strengths.

***

All my life I grew up detesting the Chinese, and never trusting them. Only after the Doklam incident when I researched did I discover the truth. How we Indians have been mostly uninformed and greatly misled and misinformed.

Because the Indian government, has mostly been led by the Nehru family since independence, the truth has been concealed, lest it reduces the halo of Nehru. Nehru may have possibly had some good personal qualities, but his qualities as a leader were very seriously wanting and this resulted in the Himalayan debacle of India.

Our text books omit the truth. I believe this can be attributed to the fact that most of our historians, and educationists along with the media are leftists, with considerable sympathy for communists.

Sadly most Indians remain unaware, about the sacrifice of our valiant and noble soldiers, and therefore unable to appreciate their contribution, then and always. Therefore we fail to honour and mourn them.

Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat the blunders with even greater costs.

________________

Aftermath:
Every cloud has a silver lining even such a tragic one as the 1962 war.
1. Parliament and the people had tolerated enough. They wanted the guilty to be held accountable. Menon, Gen. Thapar, and the entire team were sacked, inspite of Nehru trying to save them. Kaul became the most discredited military commander of the 1962 debacle.
2. Indian leadership received a wakeup call to reality.
3. The Indian army was beefed up and further professionalised, with much less political interference. As a result India was able to very effectively handle the subsequent invasions of Pakistani in 1965, 1971, and 1999. It also gave India the ability to cope effectively with Chinese aggression in 1967 and gave them a bloody nose.
4. Now India is officially in possession and control of 87,000 sq. kms in Arunachal Pradesh.
5. Tragically very few Indians, know the truth about the sacrifices our soldiers made and will always make.

People and nations respect only strength.
If India seeks to be great once again, then we must be culturally socially, economically, militarily and politically so strong, that we can actually afford to be the peace loving gentle giant that we have always aspired to be.

***

Written and Posted: - by Gurvinder Singh

______________

References:
* Events leading to the Sino Indian conflict of 1962 by Sunil Khatri - IDSA
* Gyalo Thondup's autobiography, 'The Noodle Maker of Kalimpong': The Untold Story of My Struggle for Tibet (2015)
* Thubten Jigme Norbu's book, 'Tibet is My Country'
* Bruce Reidel's book, JFK's Forgotten Crisis: Tibet, the CIA, and the Sino-Indian War (2015)
* Ghosts of 1962: Henderson Brooks - Bhagat leaked report by Neville Maxwell
* 1962: The War That Wasn't - By Shiv Kunal Verma
* When Nehru hid the truth about China building a road across Indian territory
* China-Tibet-India: The 1962 War and the Strategic Military Future - By Gautam Das

 
 
Powered by Mad Mimi®A GoDaddy® company